A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between prospective neighbours about the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the positioning became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the legal timeline.
On the Main of your dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as constructed, goes over and above what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental security and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply just looking to create a family members residence in accordance With all the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Place of Conservation and say that all will work have already been carried out based upon Specialist advice and permitted ideas. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, do not alter the fundamental facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for just a condition that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Instances short article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman had Earlier been linked to neighborhood advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from extremely distinct Skilled backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality in the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme tactic.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays unsure. The court docket have to ascertain whether or not the wall as created complies with arranging authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up problems. However the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who should Dwell alongside one another extended once the lawful expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen beyond that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. It also underscores how swiftly a local disagreement René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times can escalate when essential difficulties including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of purely natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of the dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal thoughts. No matter whether it'll ultimately be altered, taken out, or accomplished as planned will depend on the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.